In a message dated 28/07/96 17:28:43, zig@emh1.pa.net (Tim Zeigler) writes:
quoted 15 lines On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, James B Gill wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, James B Gill wrote:
>> > yes. I will also play LFO's "Advance" more than "Frequencies". Also I
>>
>> ...what's the verdict on Advance? all i could gather from the few reviews
>> i saw was that it was a real departure from Frequencies...
>
>Yes, it is a departure. I don't own Frequencies, but the many times
>I've listened to it in the used shops, I've always found it to be rather
>one-dimensional (not necessarily a bad thing, mind you). But Advance
>seems to take a bit more concentrated listening effort. It's void of
>dancey bass grooves and has a harsher feel that might cause one to
>overlook some unique elemenets going on underneath. Of course, if
>you wanna dance to it, you probably could, but it will take you other
>places as well.
>
Considering the 5 year gap between both albums ,
I think comparisons are pretty useless , "Frequencies"
was made in a different era , when very different things
were happening( . .. . flashback to 1991 - driving home
from club at 3 in the morning , hearing John Peel
spinning "We are Back".. . . . playing "What is House"
endlessly "House to me is Phuture , Fingers , Adonis"...)
"Advance" was more or less a Mark Bell solo Lp , Gez
only contributed to two tracks , read the interview in Magic
Feet for his side of the Story , Bell is continuing as LFO
alone! For a better overview of the 5 year gap , check out all
the solo stuff (Speedjack,G Man,Feedback,Clarke) as well
as LFO v Fuse remixes ( recently repressed on Plus 8)
s.m.@4th world
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/4thworld
---------------------
Forwarded message:
From: zig@emh1.pa.net (Tim Zeigler)
Sender: owner-idm@hyperreal.com
To: idm@hyperreal.com
Date: 96-07-28 13:28:43 EDT
quoted 6 lines On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, James B Gill wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, James B Gill wrote:
> > yes. I will also play LFO's "Advance" more than "Frequencies". Also I
>
> ...what's the verdict on Advance? all i could gather from the few reviews
> i saw was that it was a real departure from Frequencies...
Yes, it is a departure. I don't own Frequencies, but the many times
I've listened to it in the used shops, I've always found it to be rather
one-dimensional (not necessarily a bad thing, mind you). But Advance
seems to take a bit more concentrated listening effort. It's void of
dancey bass grooves and has a harsher feel that might cause one to
overlook some unique elemenets going on underneath. Of course, if
you wanna dance to it, you probably could, but it will take you other
places as well.
Tim