179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Who is Cygnus X?

3 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-04-15 16:30Zenon M. Feszczak (idm) Who is Cygnus X?
└─ 1996-04-15 18:30Rob Thorley Re: (idm) Who is Cygnus X?
1996-04-15 19:58Zenon M. Feszczak Re: (idm) Who is Cygnus X?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-04-15 16:30Zenon M. FeszczakWho is Cygnus X? Just wondering. Discovered their CD on the CDNow site. Sounds quite inten
From:
Zenon M. Feszczak
To:
Date:
Mon, 15 Apr 1996 09:30:48 -0700
Subject:
(idm) Who is Cygnus X?
permalink · <v02130502ad98299be31c@[159.14.31.10]>
Who is Cygnus X? Just wondering. Discovered their CD on the CDNow site. Sounds quite intense. Well, from what can tell over a RealAudio connection. Would have to put it through some good bumping bass bins to do it justice. Anyone have info on them/him/her/it? Zenon M. Feszczak Philosopher ad nauseam
1996-04-15 18:30Rob Thorleyi don't know exactly, but they're on Harthouse records in Europe (home to Sven Vath, Der D
From:
Rob Thorley
To:
Zenon M. Feszczak
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 15 Apr 1996 19:30:36 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Who is Cygnus X?
Reply to:
(idm) Who is Cygnus X?
permalink · <Pine.SUN.3.91.960415192514.19806C-100000@langs>
i don't know exactly, but they're on Harthouse records in Europe (home to Sven Vath, Der Dritte Raum,...) and they had a well popular track last year called "Orange Theme". It would appear that most of their music (having only heard one other track) is similarly paced, and they recently released an album, which i really want to get. If they fail the idm test, it would be on the "i". But variety is, after all, the spice... Rob.
1996-04-15 19:58Zenon M. Feszczak>I wouldn't really class Cygnus X as idm, but then again idm is a very >misleading label i
From:
Zenon M. Feszczak
To:
Date:
Mon, 15 Apr 1996 12:58:26 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) Who is Cygnus X?
permalink · <v02130507ad985aa8a3f8@[159.14.31.10]>
quoted 3 lines I wouldn't really class Cygnus X as idm, but then again idm is a very>I wouldn't really class Cygnus X as idm, but then again idm is a very >misleading label in the first place. >
Why not? Is it the "i" test, the "d" test, or the "m" test that Cygnus failed? Lord Zenovitch