At 12:01 1997-11-11 -0600, you wrote:
quoted 1 line It would seem: the CD is a direct repress of the original. My bet is
>It would seem: the CD is a direct repress of the original. My bet is
that the
quoted 6 lines tracks are exactly the same as on the original AB3 cd repress.
>tracks are exactly the same as on the original AB3 cd repress.
>As for the AB3 vinyl... the original vinyl had more than 4 tracks. If you
>vinyl-heads recall, it had 10 tracks (two of them occupying the same groove..
>you know, left and right channels being different songs).
>
>So, what are these 4 tracks on the vinyl repress? Are they new? Anyone
who has
quoted 1 line heard both new and old vinyl.. please speak up...
>heard both new and old vinyl.. please speak up...
As far as I've understood this is the situation:
- The original vinyl has 9 tracks. The original CD has 13.
- AB3 1997 CD is an exact copy of the 1993 13-track CD.
- AB3 1997 Vinyl is a copy with the four tracks missing from the original
vinyl, ie not new tracks, but pressed on vinyl for the first time.
If you have the 2 vinyls, you have all tracks, if you have either of the
CDs you have all tracks as well. The track [unknown] that was track 8 on
the CD is one of Richard James' best tracks ever if you ask me. So git it! :)
Yours,
Fe.
- sale/wants:
http://gargamel.com/frankie ''' = ) - =-= = '''''''''' -
- plodulism!:
http://gargamel.com/plod -->--> -/ - - - ] '''''''' -
- dot records:
http://gargamel.com/dot '''''' = -.. =-= = '''908285' -