179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Q - Frequencies

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-03-01 01:18Brian Willoughby (idm) Q - Frequencies
1996-03-01 02:43theorem@rust.net Re: (idm) Q - Frequencies
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-03-01 01:18Brian WilloughbyNow that the topic seems to be LFO: I have a question and some comments. What's the deal w
From:
Brian Willoughby
To:
Date:
Thu, 29 Feb 96 17:18:09 -0800
Subject:
(idm) Q - Frequencies
permalink · <9603010118.AA01115@sounds>
Now that the topic seems to be LFO: I have a question and some comments. What's the deal with the US release of Frequencies on Tommy Boy Records? Tracks like "You Have To Understand," "El Ef Oh!" and "Love is the Message" are mislabelled with the wrong track number. It seems like "Track 14" is actually sequenced as track 7, and "Simon from Sydney" clocks in at 5:05 instead of 4:35 as marked, unless it is actually some other track. I haven't heard the remixes of tunes like "Tan Ta Ra," so it's hard for me to be sure of which you're talking about when those of you on this mailing list mention favorite or distinctive tracks from Frequencies. I gave a quick listen to Advance before the thread really got going, and I didn't think it was all that bad. It did not make me want to purchase it right away, but I still had not gotten into Frequencies, which I only got this month, finally. What really hit me about Advance was the bass, although the headphones probably don't reproduce as well as my subs. The melodies were a bit on the simple side, but this seemed stylistically similar to Kraftwerk. I must admit that I am no a big fan or expert on either LFO or Kraftwerk. I do remember reading that LFO take credit for the deep bass trend in techno. Brian
1996-03-01 02:43theorem@rust.netAt 5:18 PM 2/29/96 -0800, Brian Willoughby wrote: >What's the deal with the US release of
From:
theorem@rust.net
To:
Date:
Thu, 29 Feb 1996 21:43:25 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) Q - Frequencies
permalink · <199603010242.VAA16430@Fe3.rust.net>
At 5:18 PM 2/29/96 -0800, Brian Willoughby wrote:
quoted 9 lines What's the deal with the US release of Frequencies on Tommy Boy Records?>What's the deal with the US release of Frequencies on Tommy Boy Records? >Tracks like "You Have To Understand," "El Ef Oh!" and "Love is the Message" >are mislabelled with the wrong track number. It seems like "Track 14" is >actually sequenced as track 7, and "Simon from Sydney" clocks in at 5:05 >instead of 4:35 as marked, unless it is actually some other track. I haven't >heard the remixes of tunes like "Tan Ta Ra," so it's hard for me to be sure of > >which you're talking about when those of you on this mailing list mention >favorite or distinctive tracks from Frequencies.
I've noticed this before too and it's hard to figure out. (I had it down a few years ago but have since forgotten) If there is someone who absolutely knows for sure what the *correct* track listing is, with numbers and lengths, could you please post it for us? I'm sorry if this is in the archives already. thanks..... ____________________________________________ Dale Lawrence.Theorem.Nude Magazine.Detroit. minimalize, fortify, and never stop digging. ____________________________________________ * http://www.rust.net/~theorem/theorem.html NudeMag http://www.sigma6.com/nude/nude.html