179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (Fwd) Re: (idm) IDM Poll 1995

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 2 days · search this subject
1995-12-11 18:15Tim Zeigler (Fwd) Re: (idm) IDM Poll 1995
└─ 1995-12-13 17:28einexile the meek Re: (Fwd) Re: (idm) IDM Poll 1995
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1995-12-11 18:15Tim Zeigler> From: "Tim Zeigler" <zig@zbi.microserve.com>: > > > If this is the policy, expect to lea
From:
Tim Zeigler
To:
Date:
Mon, 11 Dec 1995 18:15:15 +0000
Subject:
(Fwd) Re: (idm) IDM Poll 1995
permalink · <199512121306.IAA00613@mail.microserve.net>
quoted 10 lines From: "Tim Zeigler" <zig@zbi.microserve.com>:> From: "Tim Zeigler" <zig@zbi.microserve.com>: > > > If this is the policy, expect to leave worthy, year-end releases > > by the wayside. To me, this doesn't make sense. Either include > > year-end releases or have the voting in mid January sometime. I > > think last year's results bear the evidence. > > If you notice, the deadline for IDM Poll submissions is Friday, > December 29th. How many releases do you think we'll miss between > then and Monday January 1st?
You're missing the point. How many of those December imports really get in our hands by 12/29? And if they do, then how many get a fair evaluation? I'm only suggesting a way to have the poll better reflect "all" releases -- assigning a cut-off based upon release date, as the original poster suggested, won't do this. And so, with the utmost confidence, I vote ISDN as best of '95 :-)
1995-12-13 17:28einexile the meekOn Mon, 11 Dec 1995, Tim Zeigler wrote: > > From: "Tim Zeigler" <zig@zbi.microserve.com>:
From:
einexile the meek
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 13 Dec 1995 09:28:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (Fwd) Re: (idm) IDM Poll 1995
Reply to:
(Fwd) Re: (idm) IDM Poll 1995
permalink · <Pine.3.89.9512130941.A18821-0100000@netcom2>
On Mon, 11 Dec 1995, Tim Zeigler wrote:
quoted 16 lines From: "Tim Zeigler" <zig@zbi.microserve.com>:> > From: "Tim Zeigler" <zig@zbi.microserve.com>: > > > > > If this is the policy, expect to leave worthy, year-end releases > > > by the wayside. To me, this doesn't make sense. Either include > > > year-end releases or have the voting in mid January sometime. I > > > think last year's results bear the evidence. > > > > If you notice, the deadline for IDM Poll submissions is Friday, > > December 29th. How many releases do you think we'll miss between > > then and Monday January 1st? > > You're missing the point. How many of those December imports really > get in our hands by 12/29? And if they do, then how many get a fair > evaluation? I'm only suggesting a way to have the poll better reflect > "all" releases -- assigning a cut-off based upon release date, as the > original poster suggested, won't do this.
Forget getting the imports into our hands and think about the fact that one is often turned onto a great record only after someone else waits until January for his imports and plays it for you. This poll should be for the best releases of 1994, not 1995. Think about it; how many people would *really* vote for Musik again? :p einexile