179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) sorry...

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 2 days · search this subject
1995-10-30 17:35(idm) sorry...
└─ 1995-10-31 19:48Johnathan A. Rickman Re: (idm) sorry...
1995-11-01 21:06Howard Berkey Re: (idm) sorry...
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1995-10-30 17:35AJSOLOMON@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDUhi, A million apologies for this post... I know for myself, and probabably quite a few of
From:
To:
Date:
30-OCT-1995 17:35:54.08
Subject:
(idm) sorry...
permalink · <01HX25SXMK7C8Y6N6O@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDU>
hi, A million apologies for this post... I know for myself, and probabably quite a few of you my interest/love for idm grew out of and evolved from a previous obsession with synth-pop, so I guess this isnt a total tangent: does anyone know how to get onto bong, the depeche mode digest? I was on it last year, and cannot figure out how to get back on(the address has changed I believe), I've used up/asked all my resources( I can't access www from my computer...) I'd appreciate any help you could give. thanx Andi now playing: Intermix, if you don't have it, you should.
1995-10-31 19:48Johnathan A. Rickmanahem......... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ''J''O''H''N'
From:
Johnathan A. Rickman
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 31 Oct 1995 14:48:21 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) sorry...
Reply to:
(idm) sorry...
permalink · <Pine.3.89.9510311458.A14910-0100000@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu>
ahem......... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ''J''O''H''N'''''''R''I''C''K''M''A''N'''''''''''''''''''''''' jknee@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu On 30 Oct 1995 AJSOLOMON@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDU wrote:
quoted 2 lines hi,> hi, > now playing: Intermix, if you don't have it, you should.
I have it! If you are refering to the first, self-titled cd that is. This cd is sooooooooo underrated. Maybe because it was released on Third Mind, a borderline techo-industrial *shudder* label. And being that this is Leeb/Fuhlber, Intermix has a hint of industrial black eyeliner to it. Sure, it uses obvious samples (Hellraiser...) and rhythm tracks long since tired out. But, what I always liked about this cd, was that most of the songs have melodies that build and build......real emotion. And instead of just randomly throwing those samples around haphazardly, they incorporate them in a way that melds the hip-hop, techno, and industrial sounds they create. The glue that holds the songs together, not just for flashyness. I appreciate the subtleties of Autechre and Seefeel, but Intermix's appeal lies in their washes of synth and cathcy bass-lines. Not subtle at all, but not cheesy or generic either. Their second cd, well that's another story. It's quite easy to tell that the first Intermix cd predates the whole AI series, but I find it to be head and shoulders above the whole Messiah/Lords of Acid/Eon genre of techno. It's definately well worth a listen for those who are understandably skeptical..........
1995-11-01 21:06Howard BerkeyAt 2:48 PM 10/31/95, Johnathan A. Rickman wrote: > I appreciate the subtleties of >Autechr
From:
Howard Berkey
To:
Johnathan A. Rickman ,
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 1 Nov 1995 13:06:12 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) sorry...
permalink · <v02130501acbd20ae4808@[192.216.140.121]>
At 2:48 PM 10/31/95, Johnathan A. Rickman wrote:
quoted 8 lines I appreciate the subtleties of> I appreciate the subtleties of >Autechre and Seefeel, but Intermix's appeal lies in their washes of synth >and cathcy bass-lines. Not subtle at all, but not cheesy or generic >either. Their second cd, well that's another story. It's quite >easy to tell that the first Intermix cd predates the whole AI series, >but I find it to be head and shoulders above the whole Messiah/Lords >of Acid/Eon genre of techno. It's definately well worth a listen >for those who are understandably skeptical..........
Actually I find all three Intermix releases superior to anything by Autechre or Seefeel. Just my personal preference, not slamming Autechre... Unfortunately they seem to be going slightly downhill. I like the second and third albums, but not nearly as much as the first. The third's main drawback is long lead-ins on each song that don't really add much. The second album is pretty good, I was probably just expecting a lot after the first. You'll have to pry that one from my cold, dead CD player after I'm gone. BTW: Pete Ashdown is right, Intermix is the BEST driving music around. I recommend the desert at night. -H-