179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 3 days · search this subject
1995-06-05 22:25Lazlo Nibble Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
└─ 1995-06-06 11:46James Skilton Re: Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
1995-06-06 15:59Erkki Rautio Re: Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
1995-06-08 13:55Tim Fothergill Re: Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1995-06-05 22:25Lazlo Nibble> I have to say that your vinyl distributers must be real fuckwits, I've > never had a rec
From:
Lazlo Nibble
To:
Intelligent Dance Music
Date:
Mon, 5 Jun 1995 16:25:32 -0600 (MDT)
Subject:
Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
permalink · <9506052225.AA09739@Rt66.com>
quoted 3 lines I have to say that your vinyl distributers must be real fuckwits, I've> I have to say that your vinyl distributers must be real fuckwits, I've > never had a record warped, cetainly not to the extent where I thought I > should take it back.
I bought plenty of vinyl before CDs were prevalent; anyone who shared that experience would have to admit that defective-out-of-the-sleeve LPs (cf. SAW II) were a *lot* more common then than defective-out-of-the-jewel-box CDs are now. Laz
1995-06-06 11:46James SkiltonLazlo Nibble wrote on Mon, 05 Jun 95 23:25:32 BST : > > I have to say that your vinyl dist
From:
James Skilton
To:
Lazlo Nibble , Intelligent Dance Music
Date:
Tue, 06 Jun 95 12:46:37 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
Reply to:
Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
permalink · <MAPI.Id.0016.00616d65737320203346364530303033@MAPI.to.RFC822>
Lazlo Nibble wrote on Mon, 05 Jun 95 23:25:32 BST :
quoted 9 lines I have to say that your vinyl distributers must be real fuckwits, I've> > I have to say that your vinyl distributers must be real fuckwits, I've > > never had a record warped, cetainly not to the extent where I thought I > > should take it back. > > I bought plenty of vinyl before CDs were prevalent; anyone who shared that > experience would have to admit that defective-out-of-the-sleeve LPs (cf. > SAW II) were a *lot* more common then than defective-out-of-the-jewel-box > CDs are now. >
I _still_ buy plenty of Vinyl, and I think that the quality of vinyl has probably got worse since the days of CD taking over, although this is a subjective statement and not borne out of any statistical analysis. J ^
1995-06-06 15:59Erkki RautioOH NO! ERkki Tampere, pHinland trerra@uta.fi
From:
Erkki Rautio
To:
Date:
Tue, 6 Jun 1995 15:59:16 +0300 (EET DST)
Subject:
Re: Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
permalink · <199506061259.PAA08602@kielo.uta.fi>
OH NO! ERkki Tampere, pHinland trerra@uta.fi
1995-06-08 13:55Tim FothergillLaz wrote: >I bought plenty of vinyl before CDs were prevalent; anyone who shared that >ex
From:
Tim Fothergill
To:
,
Date:
Thu, 8 Jun 1995 14:55:50 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: Oh boy, vinyl vs CD again!
permalink · <374F320CFE@pear.le.ac.uk>
Laz wrote:
quoted 4 lines I bought plenty of vinyl before CDs were prevalent; anyone who shared that>I bought plenty of vinyl before CDs were prevalent; anyone who shared that >experience would have to admit that defective-out-of-the-sleeve LPs (cf. >SAW II) were a *lot* more common then than defective-out-of-the-jewel-box >CDs are now.
I appreciate that CDs have a very low defective frequency, all I was saying is that vinyl isn't as bad as people paint it. I don't want to compare the two as they are completely different ways of storing music. Lots of love Tim One of the least common things in the world today is: common sense.