quoted 3 lines The problem is that, within the
>>> The problem is that, within the
>>> parameters of a given culture, the average person can only enjoy, or
>>> tolerate, a certain level of departure from the norm.
quoted 7 lines I find this to be true even for many people who are into industrial,
>>I find this to be true even for many people who are into industrial,
>>i.d.m., and other styles at varying distances from the mainstream.
>>People get a certain idea of what "industrial" or "electro" or "metal" is
>>supposed to be, and generally don't seem to want to be bothered with
>>something at the edges of these styles, or something that crosses the
>>lines between them. These are people who define themselves as
>>adventurous and open to new experience.
But, then there are people who only believe in pursuing the purest realms of
established "experimental" music, instead of creating something truly new or
a untried fusion of different elements. This is a two sided coin. You may end
up with a masterpiece, but more likely, you end up with something
monostylistically boring. Experimental musicians often categorically regect
mainstream music styles. This is also not open minded. One of the best tools
in musical composition is contrast. Stylistic contrast can be quite
effective. That is why I think "mu-ziq vs. the Auteurs" is so cool. Orbital
and the Orb also mix experimentalism and populist appeal quite well. Don't
get me wrong, I really like extreme music. It is just that if you return to
something "normal" and then veer out to something experimental, you can
accentuate and dramatize the difference.
quoted 5 lines And this is very much so among the "art-music" or academic crowd. I
>And this is very much so among the "art-music" or academic crowd. I
>decided not to pursue a Master's degree in composition. I earned A's in
>comp courses, but these were for electronic music. My professors
>understood what I was doing but warned that those who would evaluate my
>portfolio would not, unless I slipped in a few string quartets.
It is best to destroy an institution from the inside. Wouldn't it be better
to write a string quartet that blows their closed minds. Or would it not be
worth the effort. I guess I always meant to and still haven't gotten around
to it. I also started my masters in composition and haven't gotten around to
finishing it, largely for the same reasons that you didn't start.
I failed to include names for all the quotes above. Hopefully you all know
who you are or were. Sorry about the confusion if you don't, but I deleted
everything and can't remember who said what now.
- Paul