179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

WHY NOT ORBITAL???

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 2 days · search this subject
1994-11-22 22:36Jasper de Jong WHY NOT ORBITAL???
└─ 1994-11-24 19:03CiM Re: WHY NOT ORBITAL???
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-11-22 22:36Jasper de Jongm > DOG, the reason I mentioned Orbital is that I was trying to make a point m > about a c
From:
Jasper de Jong
To:
Date:
Tue, 22 Nov 1994 20:36:11 -0200
Subject:
WHY NOT ORBITAL???
permalink · <785631122.AA00631@mailman.gds.nl>
m > DOG, the reason I mentioned Orbital is that I was trying to make a point m > about a certain style of live performance involving "playing" sequencers m > and mixing boards with all the notes being prerecorded, which I know m > Orbital has used in the past (are they still using their MMT-8's, or are m > they using ADATs now?). I wouldn't be surprised that they use ADATs now, cos their gigs get a bit to similair. I saw two of them and they were more or less the same. I was really excited after hearing the first gig, but the second one brought in little new elements...Too little.. m > PEACEOUT m > MR-808 CU!
1994-11-24 19:03CiMOn Tue, 22 Nov 1994, Jasper de Jong wrote: > m > DOG, the reason I mentioned Orbital is th
From:
CiM
To:
Jasper de Jong
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 24 Nov 1994 19:03:17 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:
Re: WHY NOT ORBITAL???
Reply to:
WHY NOT ORBITAL???
permalink · <Pine.3.89.9411241839.B22966-0100000@radon.sys.uea.ac.uk>
On Tue, 22 Nov 1994, Jasper de Jong wrote:
quoted 10 lines m > DOG, the reason I mentioned Orbital is that I was trying to make a point> m > DOG, the reason I mentioned Orbital is that I was trying to make a point > m > about a certain style of live performance involving "playing" sequencers > m > and mixing boards with all the notes being prerecorded, which I know > m > Orbital has used in the past (are they still using their MMT-8's, or are > m > they using ADATs now?). > > I wouldn't be surprised that they use ADATs now, cos their > gigs get a bit to similair. I saw two of them and they were more > or less the same. I was really excited after hearing the first gig, > but the second one brought in little new elements...Too little..
I saw at least one ADAT on their rig (live) and I know that Orbital use them quite a lot in their studio. || [CiM] || u9323899@sys.uea.ac.uk || http://www.sys.uea.ac.uk/~u9323899/