| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-10-2417:39 | Matthew Guest <mguest@alphagraphics.com> | RE: [idm] juicy luke vibert Re: (plug 1, 2 and 3)
>Aren't these the three EPs… |
| 2000-10-2309:02 | Matthew Burrows <matthew_burrows@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] juicy luke vibert
the best luke vibert stuff (but unfortunately the hardest to get hold… |
| 2000-10-2510:52 | Matthew Burrows <matthew_burrows@hotmail.com> | RE: [idm] juicy luke vibert
Re: (plug 1, 2 and 3)
>Aren't these the three EPs… |
| 2000-10-2417:40 | Jeff Shoemaker <cache@texas.net> | RE: [idm] juicy luke vibert At 12:50 PM 10/24/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Aren't… |
| 2000-10-2416:50 | Bob Bannister <bobban@wextech.com> | RE: [idm] juicy luke vibert Aren't these the three EPs that were compiled onto the second… |
| 2000-10-2008:45 | Irene McC <substar@iafrica.com> | [idm] juicy luke vibert On 19 Oct 2000, Guillaume Grenier wrote re Re: [idm] Best sample… |
| 2000-10-2418:01 | Josh Davison <yoshi@enteract.com> | RE: [idm] juicy luke vibert yep, top notch programming too, my fave is the one with LL… |