| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-06-1523:50 | Chris Fahey <chris.fahey@raremedium.com> | RE: [idm] constructive criticism - was Re: phoenecia (And why...) Adam Piontek:
> but reviews are inherently subjective. this has been covered
> already… |
| 2000-06-1607:05 | <IDMKitten@aol.com> | Re: [idm] constructive criticism - was Re: phoenecia (And why...) why cant people just take things with a grain of salt on… |
| 2000-06-1521:18 | Adam Piontek <damek@earthling.net> | Re: [idm] constructive criticism - was Re: phoenecia (And why...) On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:51:07 +0100, Ross Balmer wrote… |
| 2000-06-1615:21 | Catfish Gil <gyaker@fragment.com> | Re: [idm] constructive criticism - was Re: phoenecia (And why...)
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Ross Balmer wrote:
>
> So far I have… |
| 2000-06-1520:51 | Ross Balmer <ross@tui.co.uk> | [idm] constructive criticism - was Re: phoenecia (And why...)
----- Original Message -----
From: |