| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2006-02-0716:32 | Corbin, Nick <Nick.Corbin@acnielsen.co.uk> | RE: [idm] CDr vs. CD
> Hmnnnn ... and then there's always the burn speed issue...
that's… |
| 2006-02-0716:44 | Alan Lockett <Alan.R.Lockett@bristol.ac.uk> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD
--On 07 February 2006 08:38 -0800 chthonic |
| 2006-02-0716:28 | anatomist <anatomist@beatsploitation.com> | RE: [idm] CDr vs. CD Hmnnnn ... and then there's always the burn speed issue...
http://www… |
| 2006-02-0715:27 | Alan Lockett <Alan.R.Lockett@bristol.ac.uk> | [idm] CDr vs. CD (apologies for cross-posting)
I recently acquired a release by Rod Modell… |
| 2006-02-0815:45 | Bryce Berny <bryce.berny@gmail.com> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD take a cd-r, and rip an image of the entire disc… |
| 2006-02-1103:55 | anti_stunna <anti_stunna@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD If you have discs burned 10 years ago and haven't seen… |
| 2006-02-0716:44 | <therealmxyzptlk@comcast.net> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD CD-rs do not have a coating over the data, so they… |
| 2006-02-0715:32 | experimedia <experimedia@gmail.com> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD There is no difference in audio quality between a replicated CD and… |
| 2006-02-0715:52 | Walkman <walkman@sutemos.net> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD I guess there is a slight difference.
Take a look here:
http… |
| 2006-02-0716:38 | chthonic <chthonic@chthonicstreams.com> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Walkman" |
| 2006-02-0716:31 | Carlo Caputo <zed@9hells.org> | Re: [idm] CDr vs. CD CD-R have a smaller lifetime, than pressed media.
http://www.cdfreaks… |
| 2006-02-0816:20 | Andreas Dagnell <andreas.dagnell@drutt.com> | RE: [idm] CDr vs. CD While doing this, it can be a good idea using Exact Audio… |