| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2001-06-0520:20 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu) [atomly |
| 2001-06-0423:13 | <JShupester@aol.com> | [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu) 1. anyone heard the new orbital full-length? worth it? comments?
2… |
| 2001-06-0520:17 | <andrei@world.std.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu) atomly wrote:
> I think the major flaw here is the assumption that… |
| 2001-06-0519:57 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu) I think the major flaw here is the assumption that "newness" is… |
| 2001-06-0513:23 | <tweibrecht@juno.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu)
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0600 omz |
| 2001-06-0519:01 | <tweibrecht@juno.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu)
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:55:24 -0700 (PDT) omz |
| 2001-06-0500:36 | omz <omz23@airmail.net> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu) >2. new squarepusher single (i think) is fantastic. anyone heard the new… |
| 2001-06-0503:56 | R. Lim <rlim@escape.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu) On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, omz wrote:
> i don't want to… |
| 1998-10-2011:29 | Al Ritchie <razor@inxpress.net> | (idm) Orbital, Squarepusher 1) I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone mention this week… |
| 2001-06-0600:59 | omz <omz23@airmail.net> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu) >On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, r.lim wrote:
>>On Mon, 4 Jun… |
| 2001-06-0519:25 | Adam Piontek <apiontek@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu)
--- tweibrecht@juno.com wrote:
>
> you dont know shit about the context...just… |
| 2001-06-0618:57 | <tweibrecht@juno.com> | Re: [idm] orbital and squarepusher(neu)
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Adam Piontek… |