179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Larry Spence
To:
bworrell
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 29 Sep 1994 09:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner
Msg-Id:
<199409291631.JAA07561@netcom13.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To:
<e89d1f60@cclink.fhcrc.org>
Mbox:
idm.9409.gz
quoted 9 lines This is essentially US law, but there are a couple of refinements.>>This is essentially US law, but there are a couple of refinements. >>A lot of old scanners belong to members of the public and I >>believe that they were grandfathered in, i.e. not confiscated. It >>is now illegal to manufacture and sell scanners. [...] >>Alan. > >I didn't know that it is now illegal to manufacture and sell scanners. >Are you sure this is right? > --Brandon
As of last April, it's illegal to manufacture or import scanners that can be "easily modified" (e.g., snip diode, pull jumper, cut trace) to receive cellular transmissions. It's not illegal to modify a scanner, nor to own a modified scanner. Actual monitoring of cellular calls is illegal (I think this has been illegal since 1986?). But almost every (US) scanner receives the frequencies used by _cordless_ phones, and the new law doesn't address them at all (that I know of). - Larry