179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris.Hilker
To:
Lazlo Nibble
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 28 Sep 1994 17:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: Re: FSOL/e-mail addresses/Scanner
Msg-Id:
<199409290018.RAA22273@netcom4.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To:
<9409282343.AA14453@RT66.com>
Mbox:
idm.9409.gz
quoted 6 lines I don't think copyright would have anything to do with it. I think it>> I don't think copyright would have anything to do with it. I think it >> would be closer to slander or libel should any of the voices be >> identified... I, for one, don't take the time to copyright my cordless >> and cellular calls. > >(Slander? Libel? Uh...no.)
Well, I don't know about other states, or countries for that matter, but the California libel code includes the publication of "embarrassing private facts" as grounds for action. And if planning to attend an En Vogue concert isn't embarrassing, I don't know what is. :) C. -- cspot@netcom.com (Chris.Hilker)........a good-foot dance in a dusted trance