on sat, 28 may 1994 00:42:53 +0100, chris (u90cmg@ecs.ox.ac.uk) asked:
quoted 2 lines hmm is the general concensus that w. trans V.1 is a quality album?>hmm is the general concensus that w. trans V.1 is a quality album?
>i auditioned it and thought it sounded ... boring?
it's a wonderful album, one of the few techno records that made their way
outside the techno community. would be better without the "changes of live"
track. it might sound boring because it uses the same motifs all through
the record. the effect of this is such though that some people have likened
it to a novel. in other words, it's an album, not a mere compilation of
tracks. play this on good equipment. the first two tracks alone are worth
the purchase. pete ashdown has done the definitive review, available at
t.s.e.
on fri, 27 may 94 18:58:23 est, Sho Kuwamoto <sho@physics.purdue.edu> asked:
quoted 1 line Speaking of which... Does someone feel like reviewing WT Vol 2?>Speaking of which... Does someone feel like reviewing WT Vol 2?
yup. i might. let's see... maybe i'll do this together with wt vol 3, which
is due any minute (don't know exactly when, maybe it's even out already),
and which is again by jeff mills. vol 2 was by rob wood.
now i ask:
the previous discussion gave the impression that x-103 was by jeff mills
*alone*. is this really true? i thought it was by him, rob wood, and i
believe yet another guy.
can anyone give a definite line-up for x-101, x-102 and x-103?
peace, p.