179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Roy Badami
To:
Chris.Hilker
Cc:
B R O T H E R A L P H A B E T , ,
Date:
Fri, 20 May 1994 14:19:51 +0100
Subject:
Re: Can the Trance Talk (was Re: it smells)
Msg-Id:
<7568.9405201319@gamgee.cam.harlequin.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<199405200027.RAA10115@netcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9405.gz
quoted 2 lines Here's a hint - quit talking about trance on this list. [...]> Here's a hint - quit talking about trance on this list. [...] > Trance, as a whole, is not IDM.
Agreed. Intelligent techno (or IDM, if you prefer) and trance are different genres of music. As I've said before, though, it's inevitable that people are going to be tempted to discuss a broader spectrum of music on the IDM list, simply because there are no mailing lists for such genres as ambient house, house, progressive house, trance, techno, and breakbeat hardcore -- as far as I'm aware. Many of these have some overlap with intelligent techno, but they are nonetheless distinct. I agree that those genres of music are not intended to be the subject matter of this list (except in so far as they intersect with intelligent techno), but telling people to discuss their music elsewhere isn't very effective when there is no elsewhere -- you'll always be pushing against the trend for this list to become the de facto dance music list. I wish I was in a position do to something about this -- I think we badly need a trance/techno list -- but unfortunately I'm not in a position to run a list..... Just my $0.02 Cosmic