179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
djkc
To:
Date:
Fri, 20 May 1994 06:53:51 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: Is the end near?
Msg-Id:
<9405200653.aa21629@blkbox.COM>
In-Reply-To:
<01HCJHD4U58200BJ53@vassar.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9405.gz
quoted 14 lines Well to me, a lot of experimental and ambient music falls under the> > > Well to me, a lot of experimental and ambient music falls under the > >heading of IDM. Warps AI series is what could be called "intelligent > >listening music", and incase you didnt notice, the list is called > >"intelligent dance music." This is how I see artists like Mu-Ziq and Aphex > >Twin being relevant as opposed to artists like Moby or the Arpeggiators. > >Im not willing to tell you, however, that your music isn't "intelligent" > >if you think it is. But, music such as Gabber and Breakbeat is not > >relevant and should be avoided. There are limits. > > But that's not what I'm arguing.. I'm hardly advocating discourse on > WWS Pussy, or any such gabber nonsense.. I am however asking that the > discussion of IDM include less predictable artists.. There are a myriad of > musicians out there making musik that's infinitely more complex and interesting
I'm all ears....err, eyes...
quoted 5 lines that Autechre.. The only reasons that I can think of as to why they don't end> that Autechre.. The only reasons that I can think of as to why they don't end > up on this list is maybe 1) that the members are biased to the Warp stuff > because it bears the official stamp on "intelligence" or 2) We have a highly > focused and therefore naive group of consumers that just don't know what > they're missing..
3) *YOU* don't share them with us. -djkc