179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
spbcajk
To:
Date:
Fri, 22 Apr 94 14:39:38 +0100
Subject:
Keyboard's distaste for idm
Msg-Id:
<26968.9404221339@link-1.ts.bcc.ac.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9404.gz
Further to the thread about why Keyboard would seem to have it in for idm, due, supposedly, to techno musos not wanting S&S keyboards, it may be worth noting that the three British music technology magazines (Sound On Sound, Music Technology and Future Music) are all much more supportive of the idm scene; interviews with the likes of Richard James, Orbital, Toby Middleton (aka Banco de Gaia), Youth etc spring to mind, as do their acceptance that a large proportion of their readership doesn't have the cash spare to go out and buy vast racks of gear and hence appreciates reviews of older synths/ samplers/drum machines which can be picked up cheaply; in the last few issues of SOS, there have been reviews of the Putney (had one anyway), the Pro1 (again had one, but watch the s/h prices rise now! That's one of my secrets gone), the JX10 . . . get the idea. The s/h scene is, however, big over here (lots of shops which advertise in MT mags advertise their s/h stock and add "dealers for Korg/Roland/Yamaha . . .); is this so in the States? I must agree, however, with the observations made about the Wakemans of this world; remember that the editor and staff of Keyboard probably got into synths by listening to Yes and it's what they all aspire to :-) See what it's like in twenty years time, when the synth users of our generation are at the helm! Cheers Jon spbcajk@ucl.ac.uk