Dan Nicholson writes:
quoted 2 lines Dancer.' I'd much rather have them watching 'On' than some shite top 4>Dancer.' I'd much rather have them watching 'On' than some shite top 40
>track.
Actually, "On" is a top 40 track, at least in the UK. I think it made it
to #29 or something. Shite? Well, that's up to the listener...
quoted 4 lines Is he not the top seller in techno ("techno" in the very broad/general>> Is he not the top seller in techno ("techno" in the very broad/general
>> sense)??
>
>So what if he is? Just maybe it's because he's so _good_.
Hurrah! Another "this music is GOOD(tm)" debate! ;-)
quoted 6 lines I dunno. I have seen a few disgruntled people, but most of these people>I dunno. I have seen a few disgruntled people, but most of these people
>weren't terribly enamored of RJ in the first place. I think people are
>finally accepting that selfishness (ie "doesn't it suck that big life is
>going to release all the rare Orb stuff so millions will own my until-now
>ultra-rare bathroom recording of Perpetual Dawn that only nineteen people
>have ever heard before) does not enhance our rave culture.
Obviously, you have never been a real record collector. You spend a lot of
time and money to find a rare recording, because it's an inspiring
challenge. A couple of months later that recording is flooding the country
and you basically trip over a copy every time you leave the house. Of course
you get upset because you wasted a lot of time and money.
- chris@minsk.docs.uu.se