179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Michael V Verhagen
To:
'---' , 'idm'
Date:
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:39:22 -0400
Subject:
RE: [idm] RE: what's everyone listening to? and how?
Msg-Id:
<4a5ff272.c6c1f10a.3e57.5474@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To:
<03EF381A316D4402BC05DB4F57F6E311@blahblah8ezi2r>
Mbox:
idm.0907.gz
These are great discussions, and are useful channels of discovering new music. I can say that I've personally expanded my own collection of music by researching artists you all have on your playlists, while also learning that some are still using records in the digital age, on the arguable basis that they sound better. I'd like to push a different topic though. I've been on this list for a few months now, and through the regular analysis of current events, the dissection of albums, the occasional humorous banter about who's better and the rare, screaming ads about upcoming clubs, I haven't seen any historical discussion behind the development of the music. I'm not a music major, nor am I above thirty years old, but I'm interested in the fact that it seems to develop in certain parts of the world among certain portions of the population. So, to make this easy, indulge in your favorite intoxicant of choice and give me a solid answer to one, or all if you're willing to try, of these questions (and this was not meant to take attention from the other equally deserving topics): Disclaimer: I'm an IDM fan. Is there a scale of progression in music? By that I mean, does music progress? If so, is IDM on the forefront of the progression of music? If so, who is developing it, the intellectuals, musicians, or a hybrid of both? This question doesn't imply musicians are unintelligent. It only creates a divide between those who further knowledge, i.e. astrophysicists, and those that further culture, i.e. painters. (I know this is in itself an oversimplification.) Does the embrace of IDM or similar music indicate anything about the society that does so? How will this music evolve from here, and how can it get better? We've all heard how it can get worse (see Industrial). I'm looking forward to the responses. Mike -----Original Message----- From: --- [mailto:psycosyin@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:08 PM To: 'idm' Subject: [idm] RE: what's everyone listening to? and how? I stick to cds; I like to have a physical manifestation of my purchase, and easier to deal with than vinyl. That said, the new ampoule offshoot, earplug, has caused me to make my first digital purchases recently. Out of sheer convenience, though, I rip everything I get instantly to computer and do all my listening through mp3 player. Stuff that's been in my ear of late: Cheju - Waiting For Tomorrow (new on Distant Noise) Yvat - Kunzite (and pretty much everything that has come out on Boltfish) Hura Yup - Half Wolf Keef Baker - Pen Fifteen Kettel - Myam James 2 Pub's neverending output on ampoule/talent hoover And lately I've had an unhealthy addiction to a local (Detroit) duo, Champions of Breakfast. More of a novelty act; video game music with lyrics about d&d and cheesy sexual innuendos, but their live shows are fun. -----Original Message----- From: chthonic streams [mailto:chthonic@chthonicstreams.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:17 PM To: idm Subject: what's everyone listening to? and how? as we know, "IDM" was never truly a genre but came to be associated with a certain "style" of electronic music. in electronic music as in everything else, styles come and go and sometimes come back again. even formats change - when IDM was first coming out the CD was dominant/ascendant, but vinyl was holding on in electronica and other underground genres. since then vinyl has reasserted itself while the CD has declined, and mp3s and other digital formats have been growing exponentially. so what electronic music gets frequent play in your music player of choice these days? and what is that player/media? me: i mostly stick to CDs because IMHO they offer the best compromise between sound quality (superior to the average mp3 rip) and artwork (smaller than vinyl sleeves), while setting each artist and "work" apart by locking it to a physical object and contained in a finite piece of media. again - just my opinion. not trying to start a format argument thread. however i recognize the flexibility of digital-only tracks and most of my mp3's are of electronic music due to its usual de-emphasis on identity and image, as well as being primarily a "singles-based" music. recent most-played electronic CDs (in no particular order): ellen allien/apparat - orchestra of bubbles ellen allien - thrills burial - (both albums) modeselektor - happy birthday, bogeybytes mix t. raumschmiere - the great rock'n'roll swindle thom yorke - eraser RMXS vex'd - degenerate venetian snares - detrimentalist, doll doll doll, find candace areal records 2rabimmel CD compilation autechre - amber aphex twin - i care because you do, classics basic channel - BCD2 clark - turning dragon kid606 - die soundboy die, kill sound before sound kills you enduser - form without function front 242 - tyranny for you front line assembly - implode tresor 100, tresor never sleeps compilations joey beltram - the rising sun my itunes "electronic" playlist is 5.5 hours of mostly techno, with some dubstep and a bit of breakbeat. the artist with the most tracks there is starkey. i got most of it from beatport. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org