179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
jason parent
To:
Date:
Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:18:03 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] who still buys CDs
Msg-Id:
<014101c8178f$95e9f880$6400a8c0@JCW2YYGLTYXADS>
Mbox:
idm.0710.gz
quoted 3 lines The claim that mp3 quality sucks is bogus imo.> The claim that mp3 quality sucks is bogus imo. > If the bitrate is at the maximum (320kbps), you won't hear the difference > with the original CD.
there are a number of factors. listen to "wish you were here" by pink floyd on a 320 kbps mp3 played through a set of tannoys or kefs or other good quality speakers at a high volume, coming from a high powered receiver and tell me it sounds the same as a cd does, if the cd player has high quality DACs. i picked that record because everybody knows what it's SUPPOSED to sound like, and because the range is very wide. you'll hear major differences in the low end and in the high end. even the mix comes out funny. you could do the experiment with lots of different stuff. i heard a major difference in thom yorke's solo album, as well as the latest nine inch nails record [which i was previewing as downloads before i picked them up, as i was skeptical about the end quality of both of them]. even the last tool album [which was a weak record] had major reproduction problems on the low end. however, if you're listening to the new spice girls record through a pair of tinny headphones coming out of a portable device, i would agree that it's unlikely to make much of a difference, but i personally can't stand to do something like that. the last time i tried to listen to something coming out of the headphone out on my cell phone was a john zorn record, and it sounded so awful i haven't even bothered using the mp3 player in it since... meaning the following: casual users will probably migrate to mp3s due to convenience. cds didn't kill records because they were cheaper to make or because the sound quality is "technically better" (let's not get into a cd vs. record argument because unlike the cd vs. mp3 argument, the cd vs. record argument is purely subjective and depends not on reproductive ability but personal taste), it was because you can skip tracks on a cd and you can't do that on a record. likewise, mp3s will prevail for casual users and those who enjoy the convenience. but, serious audio geeks can immediately tell the difference and will drop cds in favour of dvds; they didn't drop thousands into their sound systems to use compressed files as a sound source. ....meaning that, i guess, cds are pretty much dying. but the future is in dvd audio, not mp3s. reminds me of the cassette vs. cd wars in the 80s. j --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org