179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
chthonic
To:
Date:
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:20:46 -0800
Subject:
Re: [idm] indie killed the idm star?
Msg-Id:
<200601101320.AA135070654@chthonicstreams.com>
Mbox:
idm.0601.gz
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "joshua twentythree" <joshua@ropeswingcities.com> Reply-To: joshua@ropeswingcities.com Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:47:03 -0700 (MST)
quoted 18 lines on the other hand, many electronic music writers and fans seem ready to>> on the other hand, many electronic music writers and fans seem ready to >> split off and name a >> new genre every time a new instrument is added or beats are changed around >> a bit. thus >> rather than giving electronica/IDM a shot in the arm, the addition of >> guitars simply created >> yet another sub-genre for a weary public to assimlate or ignore - >> "indietronica". united we >> stand, divided we fall. > > > >so... then could that be summed up as saying, "the people who like IDM >killed IDM"? > >:) > >joshua.
heh. well that would presume i am declaring IDM "dead"...and no one with half a brain would touch that thread with a 12k pole. personally, i love electronic music, i love music that uses a minimum of electronics (basically the recording equipment), i love music that mixes and matches whatever. i admit i am a bit "over" the "standard" IDM "sound" as practiced by certain descendants of the biggest bands on warp. but the best stuff stays listenable, and new things constantly recreate from the old by breaking the rules and remaking their own. if IDM is simply one of many catch-all terms to define an ever-morphing type of electronic music, rather than a single genre existing during a fixed period of time, then theoretically it will never "die". d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org