179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Josh String
To:
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:32:44 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: The great DSP noise debate
Msg-Id:
<41F836AC.5030106@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:
<E1CtTsJ-000DGO-RW@oceanus.uk.clara.net>
Mbox:
idm.0501.gz
David William Newman wrote:
quoted 7 lines Context and balance is a big issue here... dsp noise and trickery can> Context and balance is a big issue here... dsp noise and trickery can > sound both complex and beautiful if framed in the right audio > environment.... where there are elements of softness, soothing, > quietness - just like you need a range of colours to appreciate white > and black in images and visa versa.... DSP is a tool - a timbre that > can add variety and richness to a piece in my opinion - it can also be > over-done.
I'm curious what is meant by "DSP" in this context... to me, DSP is an acronym for "Digital Signal Processing", which these days encompasses any recording tracked or mixed on anything more technologically advanced than a 4-track tape recorder. I am sure you're not just talking about compression and EQ -- there must be something more specific that you have in mind, similar to when people speak about "electronic music", they are not referring to all music played using electronics. So do you just mean artists utilizing any digital effects to augment existing sound (i.e. reverb, amp-modeling, compression, equalization) or more "boutique" effects such as granular time/pitch effects or FFT noise gates and stuff like that? Anyway in my opinion, if it sounds good, use it. But I think a lot of people have a tendency to just reach for the plug-ins folder as a force of habit just to sound "contemporary", regardless of appropriateness. Forever drenched in reverb, -Josh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org