[idm] How 'cutting edge'/difficult does IDM have to be?
Msg-Id:
<627F05DC-68A7-11D8-A0BA-000393C80624@gmx.de>
Mbox:
idm.0402.gz
Hi all
first of all, I joined this mailing list very recently due to my
interest in IDM and related styles - I am a producer myself, even
though what I do has only marginally to do with IDM, it's actually
clicky housey abstract jazz funk live electronic music.
Anyway, I have been listening to a fair amount of IDM including all the
'big names' and when I got the latest Savath&Savalas album, Apropra't
(which is very mellow and melodic, particularly when you set it against
some of Squarepusher's more ferocious tunes, for instance), I started
to think about an interesting question which I'm sure many of you have
an answer/opinion for - and that is:
How difficult to listen/noise-based/complicated/progressive does IDM
have to be? Taking S&S as an example, there is some magnificent and
also complex electronic elements in the background, so it's by no means
"one-dimensional", and when you compare it to Mira Calix, for instance,
it's very "easily" listenable. Mira seems to have a fair amount of
abstract, dark elements in her music, and this I sometimes find too
much despite the fact that I love complex, challenging music (jazz,
m-base stuff, mr. bungle....).
Sure, this is all a matter of taste you might say - and you're right
-but I would still like to figure out where the Intelligent in the IDM
name ends and where 'banal', for lack of a better word, starts.
Probably a matter of personal opinion - but I would love to see what
you people think about this phenomenon. Because, much as I respect
Squarepusher and get inspiration from his music, it really is
impossible to listen to sometimes - for me at least - due to the sheer
'stress factor'.
OK, looking forward to your messages!
Roland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org