Ignrance writes:
no thanks, chief. i have to read for my job and have plenty of worthwile
material to get to.
Zach Replies:
I am responding to this for the because I am a bit confused about why
someone would argue something when that person hasn't and is not willing to
read the material over which the subject is over. I doesn't seem to be
rational to me.
This is not an attack.
It just seems to be a argument from ignorance. Why even argue at all? What
would the arguement be grounded in at all except a uninformed opinion?
Please excuse any words that have negative conotations that go with them. I
can't seem to come up with replacement words that mean the same but have
positve, or even better neutral conotation. This is fault of mine. Please
focus on meaning.
thank you,
zach
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org