179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Irene McC
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:36:51 +0200
Subject:
[idm] Ogg vs MP3 encoding
Msg-Id:
<3E9DA2C3.19141.10F53B9@localhost>
In-Reply-To:
<574EEDF8F505D21189E500A0C9C855780123DAFB@PFS_MAILSVR2>
Mbox:
idm.0304.gz
On 16 Apr 2003 at 9:14, Knapman, James wrote:
quoted 2 lines Oh, and all this was before I discovered Ogg Vorbis anyway. Which is> Oh, and all this was before I discovered Ogg Vorbis anyway. Which is > much better (and smaller).
Is it really smaller? With all this talk, I have Ogg'd my first track ever. To do a true comparison, I used 128kbit compression and compressed the same 4:09min track to Ogg Vorbis (file totals 4,088 kb) and the same track at 128 kbits MP3'd comes to a total of 3,906 kb. Obviously this is a tiny difference in size (and who said that size matters anyway, harrrrhargh). What compression rate do you recommend for Ogg? I just used Sound Forge, which offers 96, 128 and 320. I haven't installed a specific Ogg-ing device! Up to now I've been encoding MP3's using 192 kbits. Sorry to all who consider this thread OT. You are welcome to respond directly and not to the IDM list (please don't bother flaming). But I have to ask this : where does the name Ogg Vorbis come from, and what does it mean? I * --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org