dude, I'm not doing much reasoning at all...
The ownership of the product is the labels. I'm not taking art here. I'm
talking units. What's the problem with that?
So want record do you want?
quoted 2 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message-----
> From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@Alum.Dartmouth.ORG]quoted 17 lines You're still "reasoning" circularly. There is no universal>
>
> You're still "reasoning" circularly. There is no universal
> idea of what
> theft is. Preceding the conception of theft is that of
> ownership, as one
> cannot steal if there is not property to be stolen. If the
> construction
> of ownership is problematic, then how can the construction of
> theft not
> be as well? I never said laws defined morality. The law
> defines what is
> theft and what is not. Do you deny that there is any question
> about what
> constitutes rightful ownership?
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org