179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
omz
To:
Date:
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:14:28 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] [OT] prog
Msg-Id:
<p05100301b8b650d19a67@[4.22.158.4]>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.SGI.4.40.0203132117010.1449011-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Mbox:
idm.0203.gz
quoted 7 lines On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, andrei wrote:> > >On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, andrei wrote: > > > >Well, I find the whole notion of "progressive" rock, or any kind of >"progressive" music, a laughable one. Yes and all the bands of their ilk >didn't do anything to help the "progression" of rock music. It was a step >in the wrong direction, imo. They mostly missed the point about what rock >music's functions are.
I'm not really talking about 'Yes and all the bands of their ilk'...When I think of progressive rock I think of Amon Duul II, Heldon, Pulsar, Lard Free, Kraftwerk, Agitation Free, Ash Ra Tempel, and so on and so on. And if you want to hear where this 'IDM' music we all know and love originated, give Cluster 'Zuckerzeit' a listen ...now that is some progressive shit! Circa 1975/6...and actually Can's 'Tago Mago' was one of the first records I can think of to use a drum machine, that was around 1970.
quoted 2 lines I'm not saying Hendrix's music was dumb, but I think he did more to>I'm not saying Hendrix's music was dumb, but I think he did more to >advance rock music than any pseudo-aristocratic band of Englishmen.
It's all about the Germans, the French, the Italians...they did way more to advance music than most 'Englishmen'... -- ________________________ omz beautamous loaf recordings http://www.hotweird.com/loaf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org