179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Helix Tradesman
To:
,
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:16:58
Subject:
Re: [idm] VBR vs fixed rate ripping
Msg-Id:
<F255QCXeklLVOcmeTEq00025804@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0201.gz
quoted 2 lines if you make a VBR file you are punching the midrange of the sound right in>if you make a VBR file you are punching the midrange of the sound right in >the gut.
how do you figure? i still havn't heard a good argument against VBR. it's theoretically best because it will dynamically assign a frame size basic on content. in practice VBR is only as good as the encoder you use, but by the same token so is a constant bitrate mp3. your mp3 is only as good as your encoder. the real question with fixed bitrate vs VBR should be this: is the algorithm which determines frame size going to pick a large enough value for the frame? if you don't trust LAME to pick this value correctly, how can you trust it to correctly decide which parts of the music are expendable? personally i trust that the frame size picking algorithm is at least as good as the algorithm which decides what sound to eliminate. as for joint stereo i think it's preferable to true stereo, but i wouldn't claim to be an expert on the specifics. again, your mp3 is only as good as your encoder. most of the info on www.r3mix.net is quite good and worth reading over (although their myths section is bullshit). cheers _________________________________________________________________ Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org