179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
No one in particular
To:
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] VBR vs fixed rate ripping
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0201310033030.10039-100000@mcgruff.internal>
In-Reply-To:
<3C591D8C.14129.60BC79@localhost>
Mbox:
idm.0201.gz
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Irene McC wrote:
quoted 1 line Is this *really* better than a fixed, say, 192?> Is this *really* better than a fixed, say, 192?
Can it hurt? You lower the bitrate for some parts that are easier to encode, and raise it for parts that are harder. If the quality is high enough, you might average 192 still, but you'll have a better sounding mp3. If the quality is lower, the average bitrate will be lower, but it will still sound as good. Bottom line: The quality/size ratio of a VBR file will always better if you have a good encoder. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org