You contradict yourself, bcayton...
1st :
quoted 8 lines No, Music has the Right to Children wasn't the most technological> No, Music has the Right to Children wasn't the most technological
> innovative of albums by any means. They didn't boast something like
> using twelve hundred thousand millions of samples used per track like
> some 'other' bands I can think of..
> Their music isn't layered with waves and waves of glitched out
> textures, odd mechanical swipes and swirls, fizzing bubbling static, and
> other forms of pointless tweaked-out DSP fuckery which some think is
> required in any record before it can be called 'IDM'.
Okay, so you say thet DIDN'T use twelve million samples, etc... no DSP
fooling, etc...
2nd:
quoted 4 lines I have no idea what kind of gear they use. (Although their music> I have no idea what kind of gear they use. (Although their music
> to me has always had a decidedly sort low-tech feel to it, but that
> doesn't matter. It's part of their charm.) And that brings me to my
> next point.
Nope. If you don't know what gear they use, how do you know how they use
it? (See point 1).
There are little things called facts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org