179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Andrew Hime
To:
Date:
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:31:56 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] lotus magazine vs vice
Msg-Id:
<012b01c19bc1$53117150$6b652104@bogdan>
Mbox:
idm.0201.gz
quoted 4 lines and has anyone heard of lotus?> >and has anyone heard of lotus? > Yeah, I've heard of lotus.. but never read it > > Lotus is probably the worst or the free publications out there. Most of
the
quoted 4 lines music articles are much more geared to the rave scene, and every issue has> music articles are much more geared to the rave scene, and every issue has > article after article after article on the "state of the rave scene" (i.e. > 1. the police are bastards for shutting us down every weekend. 2. the > promoters are bastards for charging such a high cover and/or not paying
the
quoted 5 lines performers/djs. 3. here's the latest laws proposed by those bastard> performers/djs. 3. here's the latest laws proposed by those bastard > polititions which will effect our weekly neo-hippie freak-outs). > > And I always questioned any publication who writes nothing but positive > reveiws of every recording it reviews. Have they no criteria? No
standards?
quoted 1 line No critical listening skills? Why is every cd the best one they ever> No critical listening skills? Why is every cd the best one they ever
heard? Yeah, I think I've seen Lotus too. I wonder if people really read the record reviews, since ravers don't care about music. If so, and they really do review everything positively, then I could send that Fluoroscopic Kid record their way and watch the mad cash flow in, huh? :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org