179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Kyle Rawlins
To:
Date:
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:36:28 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] Rolling Stone on Drukqs
Msg-Id:
<20011026163628.G9735@cs.umass.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<B7FE55A1.530B%forel@mac.com>
Mbox:
idm.0110.gz
I think that the idea that the quality of an action (music making, acting, writing, etc.) is what makes people famous is a little naive. In fact, I'd tend to think that what makes most people famous is a combination of luck, and being in the right place in the right time (which really just boils down to luck). That's not to say that there's no overlap between the famous and the good (at whatever they do), or between the unfamous and the bad. Of course, I have never done anything that could conceivably make me famous and never tried to publish or distribute any music. I haven't really been following the argument that this statement came out of, so maybe I am missing some context, too. -Kyle R On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:50:40PM -0400, forel wrote:
quoted 3 lines If you really could do all you claim, why aren't you fuckers famous? It> If you really could do all you claim, why aren't you fuckers famous? It > would be easier for you to hear and appreciate the music if you didn't talk > about yourselves so fucking much.
-- http://mas.cs.umass.edu/~rawlins -- God is god. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org