i'm curious, does gay = bad ?
also, it's deez nuts not these nuts.
thank you.
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:06:59 -0500 "somrux" <bishop@somrux.com> writes:
quoted 117 lines No, what's weak is YOU driving home the "in-your-opinion" fact that
> No, what's weak is YOU driving home the "in-your-opinion" fact that
> "we
> 'youngsters' got ahold of computers and started making weak music".
> Are you
> saying that using a computer to produce or sequence music = crap?
> Because
> that was the subject, Omar. More pointedly...
>
> No one said that you have to "live according to your (our)
> pop-cultural
> rules"...now you're just getting wacky. I mean that it's weak to
> assume
> that more cruddy or 'less-than-quality' music is being made now
> because
> computers are actively being used more-and-more to produce and
> sequence said
> music. Any dumbass can go get a Casio SK5 and a make a gay song.
> So why
> don't calm your jets there, sparky.
>
> To summarize: In response to your last statement ("Go analyze a
> statement
> from Elvis, u'd be closer to the mark"),
>
> analyze these nuts.
>
>
>
> ---original message---
>
> .......looks like you caught more than a worm.........
>
> I hate to burst your bubble but where did he go wrong in those
> statements.
> Fact is that since many of you youngsters got a hold
> of computers---U now make weak music(and I would hold
> that the output of weak releases to quality/substantive
> releases has sharply increased since that time). Look in the mirror
> and
> repeat
> the words denial my friend.............:)
>
> Here's what's weak, some gooney-nerds trying to analyze a statement
> by a Giant thats put out some good music over time and runs
> a huge record label. Which one of you R doing that? And how long
> have you
> been doing it? Besides, WE dont live according to your pop-cultural
> rules and all those shibboleths dervied therefrom.(How can a Mexican
> analyze
> Chinese culture?.......makes no cultural sense..)..like your
> comments,
> biased!
>
> Go analyze a statement from Elvis, u'd be closer to the mark....
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: somrux
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:42 PM
> To: idm@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: [idm] Interesting quote/Derrick May
>
> I agree...that IS pretty weak.
>
> Boring music is boring music. It doesn't matter if someone turns it
> out on
> a computer, on a hardware sequencer or on a damn washboard with
> silver
> spoons. Crappy music is crappy music...
>
> -somrux.
> http://www.somrux.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Reading, John" <jreading@proxicom.com>
> To: <idm@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:03 PM
> Subject: RE: [idm] Interesting quote/Derrick May
>
>
>
>
> > Computer-based sequencers
> > are going to
> > make the market more boring because it'll be easier for
> > people to create
> > boring music. What comes easy has no substance, what comes with
> > determination and a bit of innovation usually survives.
>
> uhhhh... yeah... whatEVA!
> Seriously, that is probably the worst thing I've ever heard on the
> subject.
>
>
> > it's not art any more
>
> typical, neophyte, kneejerk thing to say.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org