179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
somrux
To:
Omar Hackett ,
Date:
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:06:59 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Interesting quote/Derrick May, I'll bite!
Msg-Id:
<004601c131a8$7969d410$6402010a@prometheushosting.com>
Mbox:
idm.0108.gz
No, what's weak is YOU driving home the "in-your-opinion" fact that "we 'youngsters' got ahold of computers and started making weak music". Are you saying that using a computer to produce or sequence music = crap? Because that was the subject, Omar. More pointedly... No one said that you have to "live according to your (our) pop-cultural rules"...now you're just getting wacky. I mean that it's weak to assume that more cruddy or 'less-than-quality' music is being made now because computers are actively being used more-and-more to produce and sequence said music. Any dumbass can go get a Casio SK5 and a make a gay song. So why don't calm your jets there, sparky. To summarize: In response to your last statement ("Go analyze a statement from Elvis, u'd be closer to the mark"), analyze these nuts. ---original message--- .......looks like you caught more than a worm......... I hate to burst your bubble but where did he go wrong in those statements. Fact is that since many of you youngsters got a hold of computers---U now make weak music(and I would hold that the output of weak releases to quality/substantive releases has sharply increased since that time). Look in the mirror and repeat the words denial my friend.............:) Here's what's weak, some gooney-nerds trying to analyze a statement by a Giant thats put out some good music over time and runs a huge record label. Which one of you R doing that? And how long have you been doing it? Besides, WE dont live according to your pop-cultural rules and all those shibboleths dervied therefrom.(How can a Mexican analyze Chinese culture?.......makes no cultural sense..)..like your comments, biased! Go analyze a statement from Elvis, u'd be closer to the mark.... ----- Original Message ----- From: somrux Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:42 PM To: idm@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [idm] Interesting quote/Derrick May I agree...that IS pretty weak. Boring music is boring music. It doesn't matter if someone turns it out on a computer, on a hardware sequencer or on a damn washboard with silver spoons. Crappy music is crappy music... -somrux. http://www.somrux.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reading, John" <jreading@proxicom.com> To: <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:03 PM Subject: RE: [idm] Interesting quote/Derrick May
quoted 6 lines Computer-based sequencers> Computer-based sequencers > are going to > make the market more boring because it'll be easier for > people to create > boring music. What comes easy has no substance, what comes with > determination and a bit of innovation usually survives.
uhhhh... yeah... whatEVA! Seriously, that is probably the worst thing I've ever heard on the subject.
quoted 1 line it's not art any more> it's not art any more
typical, neophyte, kneejerk thing to say. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org