179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Anig Browl
To:
IDM List
Date:
Wed, 15 Aug 2001 21:14:33 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] copy protection (crap)
Msg-Id:
<00c601c125e2$2754f3c0$daa7869f@pauls>
Mbox:
idm.0108.gz
From: The Chisa <matt@holland.deathhouse.net>
quoted 4 lines See, the burr in my fur about all of this is not that I can't copy> See, the burr in my fur about all of this is not that I can't copy > prerecorded music, legally or otherwise, but that a government sanctioned > institution is working towards monopolistic control of recording formats > in general.
Certainly, money talks - hence my complaints elsewhere about the DMCA. And this is also why many artists wind up signing crappy contracts with record companies - getting some money is better than none. Indeed, that's why many people sign crappy contracts with employers that require them to be tested for drug use and the like. Big entertainment companies often demand that the 'talent' agree to clauses governing personal behaviour and so on in case they wind up in rehab during that difficult third album stage.
quoted 7 lines Once this copy-protection shit is in full effect, how is an> Once this copy-protection shit is in full effect, how is an > unsigned artist / home recorder supposed to get his material recognized > except by going through the "official" corporate channels? I've built up > my entire career on the internet and the mp3 format -- I'm not a hugely > recognized artist, but I've got some fans and some clout, which I never > would have been able to accomplish in the old days of demo tapes and > college radio.
This is a very good question. I'm also putting out a little music on mp3, and I hope that it will go somewhere in the future too. To be frank, I don't know how this can eventually translate into earning a living for most people. Of course the talented artist can try to get signed to a label, and fortunately there are many fine independent labels for those of us who like weird music. And any artist can work towards building up a fan base and then making some income by touring. But if you want to reach a very wide audience, without getting into bed with Big Media, I really don't know. Personally, I don't feel so talented that I have serious expectations of making a full-time income from music, and I'd be quite happy to have an enjoyable day job and play live at small weird music events from time to time. But it must be deeply frustrating for more traditional entertainers who aspire to be on a big stage and have to make a lot of compromises to do so. Really, those of us who like/make weird music are quite well off, because the very unpopularity of this music with the average consumer is what glues the underground together. There is a critical mass of people who like good house, techno, experimental, classical music, and labels and promoters are able to work together to make structures that allow it to be heard (many orchestra musicians are in the same financial boat as bedroom composers). So while the hot new wannabe who mails a demo to Warp can't realistically expect to become an international megastar, neither do they have to worry too much about being asked to rewrite their stuff to make it more chart-friendly, or ripped off by outrageous contracts or anything. I think the real losers are the people who want to make more conventional accessible music. I'm not thinking about the latest plastic pop clones, but credible songwriters like David Gray or Tracy Chapman - they're good artists, who've chosen to say something through the medium of ballads, and that's as worthy as any other kind of music if it's done well. These artists tend to get really kicked around by the music business, because they need mainstream exposure to get any serious degree of success, but they're not big sellers. David Gray had respectable sales of two albums but got kicked off his label when they decided to focus on big-name acts. The hit he had last year with 'Babylon' was released twice by his own label before a larger one took a chance on him and picked up his 3rd album. Because artists like these can't rely on a specialist music fanbase like the ones mentioned above, lots of them get nowhere in the modern music business because it's so hard to get any radio exposure. This seems to be the problem in every market. Irish people like to congratulate themselves that our country has produced the world's biggest rock band, U2. Now I remember when I was a lad of 10 or 12 and they were having their early hits in Ireland - raw-boned pimply teenagers with dodgy haircuts (even then), and a few catchy riffs. Grand lads, but nobody thought they'd be filling stadiums five years later. Now the Irish music industry (and media) revolves around acts like the Corrs, Westlife, Samantha Mumba, and a couple of unmentionably bad dance producers - manufactured pop for people who see music as lifestyle accessory. There are a few decent new artists trying to make it with credible music, but they get about as much exposure as last year's mobile phone. I think this is very bad for music in general, and obscure genre music as well, because it means that people are growing up with the idea of music as a prepackaged commodity that comes in a limited variety of flavours, and are simply unaware that there are more choices available. That means less variety in record stores, and fewer oppotunities for musicians to play as well. The city I live in (Limerick) used to have a good concert hall - in the 80s I could go and see a band every week, and every few months there'd be some big act from the UK whose albums you might own, so people were able to see worthwhile bands like the Smiths locally. Although the city has grown by about 50% since then, there is no venue large enough to house big pop acts and not many people interested in new bands, so there are only a few venues in town that host any live music at all. Apart from a tiny cooperative started recently by some local punk/thrash bands that book a venue and get 5 or 6 artists in to make the most of it, there is almost no live music scene here any more. Forget going to a club, unless you like listening to the same tunes as the radio while surrounded by drunks trying to show off this week's new clothes/body piercing. It doesn't seem much better around the rest of the country, even in Dublin (which has almost a million people). IDM artists do come to Ireland from time to time, but these days there are just very few venues for them to play at. Well, sorry, this has turned into a kind of indictment on the state of the music industry, which I hadn't planned to write. I guess I feel this entire copyright argument is just a symptom of the much bigger problem of commodification of the music industry.
quoted 2 lines In short: buy nothing, steal everything, destroy system, build new system> In short: buy nothing, steal everything, destroy system, build new system > on rubble. IMHO
I wish I could agree, but without an alternative plan, the new systems tend to wind up as duplicates of the old, or even worse. In some respects, the above describes exactly how big music operates today: sign as few people as possible, overwork every new trend to death, and swamp the market with cheesy instant-appeal product. Anig Browl _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org