179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Adam Piontek
To:
Inconvenient Dark Matter
Date:
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:50:55 -0400
Subject:
RE: [idm] copy protection (crap)
Msg-Id:
<LOEJLJGDFOBDGGLBNFJFOEJECAAA.apiontek@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:
<00b801c12519$8b406d70$e5464440@shimonent>
Mbox:
idm.0108.gz
quoted 11 lines From: Static Beats [mailto:static@staticbeats.com]> From: Static Beats [mailto:static@staticbeats.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:34 PM > > Actually I think what The Chisa was referring to was more along > the lines of corporations who wished MP3 was *completely* banned. > Notice the introduction of copy protection measures in Windows XP > coupled with the removal of high-quality MP3 encoding options. > > If you cannot make MP3's in the first place (because new software > and OS's don't allow it) then how can you, as an independent, get > your work out there in this fashion?
People actually use MS products to create/encode their music? I mean, sure, I use Windows on my PC, but I've never used a MS program to rip/encode MP3s, and I don't intend to start, even if theirs *wasn't* going to be crippled. And if I wanted to actually make music, I was under the impression that all the usual culprits (max/msp/fruityloops/rebirth/whateverthelatestthingis) were made by companies other than MS. It's a valid point that, if MP3 were to completely disappear, it would remove an attractive option, but I don't think there will ever come a time when there are not alternatives. Even MP3 must be replaced/deprecated someday... And what about Macs? -Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org