179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Seth Branum
To:
Clint Anderson
Cc:
Laurent Knauth , Da Beber , Basma O , IDM
Date:
Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:43:35 -0700
Subject:
Re: IDM Was the Romanticism of the New Millennium - Noisey
Msg-Id:
<CA+X_MLzpbGpB0g3pUsJJrYnsDqBwj=SoOb=rsAUYTN7QuOA34A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CAFhVXM-+s6N9O80CvFYfJOcq+i6qjUWy2HUzGkgD4RZzQCV=9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2017-06.gz
Maybe he's referring to Richard and his absorbed twin :D On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Clint Anderson <clinta@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 49 lines i love how he refers to aphex twin as "they"> i love how he refers to aphex twin as "they" > good article tho, the guys writing wanders a bit but i get what he's > saying and it's very insightful > > > Clint Anderson > Systems Engineer > "Freedom -- paint me a picture!" -- Burton Cummings > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Laurent Knauth <laurent.knauth@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The problem with these guys — Mozart, Beethoven, Debussy, Ravel, Chopin, >> Dvorak, Borodine, Elgar, Granados (feel free to complete) *«and to all >> DJs all over the world ! Hyper ! Hyper !» — *is that everybody wants to >> speak for them. >> >> As for IDM, it should only speak for itself. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Da Beber <superdezzz@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I love to say that IDM would be exactly what Mozart or Beethov would >>> have created if they had the same technology... >>> >>> didn't finish reading the article but I kinda agree withh it so far. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *De :* Laurent Knauth <laurent.knauth@gmail.com> >>> *Envoyé :* lundi 12 juin 2017 14:32 >>> *À :* Basma O >>> *Cc :* IDM >>> *Objet :* Re: IDM Was the Romanticism of the New Millennium - Noisey >>> >>> Hmm ! >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Basma O <basma.o@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/idm-was-the-romanticis >>>> m-of-the-new-millennium?utm_source=vicefbus >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >