179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Doc Faustus
To:
,
Cc:
Date:
Sun, 06 May 2001 15:42:13
Subject:
Re: [idm] Anyone else on here not like "IDM"?
Msg-Id:
<F163uNY1SWoBDyseVwr00001dfb@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0105.gz
Everything is gimmicky, time for my anti-depressants... Roy Lopez exchange variation is gimmicky, King's Indian is gimmicky, eventually... get a Django record, get Mr.Dibbs scratchin a Django record. Come back to it in a while. Listen to Dr. Laura, fuck... what's the final solution? Sonic Youth? I know, my secret recordings :) Time for Three Skeleton Key vs. Edward Scissorhands. Create somethin and keep it a secret, there is too much culture. Keep something for yourself. Create and Nurture, don't destroy...
quoted 122 lines From: The Chisa <matt@holland.deathhouse.net>>From: The Chisa <matt@holland.deathhouse.net> >To: erik pearson <efric@hotmail.com> >CC: idm@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: [idm] Anyone else on here not like "IDM"? >Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 06:49:03 -0400 (EDT) > > >I've said it before, and I'll say it again: IDM is gimmicky and therefore >doomed. I'll take Gorecki over Global Communication any day of the week. > > >m@2zo >www.thechisa.com > > >"Like David said in the 23rd Psalm, 'Though I walk through the valley of >the shadow of death.' See, nobody say, 'Hey, man, let's go shoppin' in >the valley of the shadow of death! Let's go buy a condo in the valley of >the shadow of death!'" > >-- Mr. T > > >On Sat, 5 May 2001, erik pearson wrote: > > > Some recent newsmagazineshow (forget which) offered the opinion that > > consumers have had their "fill" of new technologies (yes, they used a >dinner > > metaphor). Maybe the same dissemination of DSP-technology is affecting >with > > what we listen and respond to... > > > > I think that after all the hype around new production software that is > > powerful/scalable (MAX, Reaktor, etc.), these tools end up with a >specific, > > identifiable sound because they do a certain, limited number of things > > quickly and easily. And that's what the majority of producers use them >for. > > Kind of like when hardware samplers first became afforable... in theory >they > > are chamelons but in retrospect, early sampler-based work used a ton of > > pitch-shifting, reversing, looping, whatever because it was new and >easy. In > > the end, you could easily pick out that a track that used a sampler. > > > > Could simply be your tired of hearing the quick and easy application of > > technology. If so, is cool... me too. :) > > > > Maybe all likeminded individuals should start an IDM-recovery list. > > > > erik > > statemusic > > > > (a lurker by nature) > > > > > > >From: Michael Upton <jetjag@paradise.net.nz> > > >To: idm@hyperreal.org > > >Subject: [idm] Anyone else on here not like "IDM"? > > >Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 11:53:25 +1200 > > > > > >No, I'm not being facetious. I'm just getting increasingly curious as >to > > >whether there's anyone else out there who no longer listens to eg. > > >Autechre, Aphex Twin, thinks labels like MAS and Skam are boring, >doesn't > > >like all these post-Aphex distorted drum machine sounds, disjointed > > >rhythms, etc. etc... > > > > > >I stay on the list because there is enough discussion of acts I do like > > >which I would never find elsewhere. I guess these are some of the >things I > > >enjoy reading about: Chain Reaction style minimal stuff (eg. Vlad. >Delay, > > >old Porter Ricks, the new Andreas Tilliander LP), "neu-Kraut" and the > > >A-Musik related stuff (eg. To Rococo Rot, Tarwater, MoM, Vert, C-Schulz >& > > >Hajsh), some Detroit sounds (eg. Shake, Carl Craig) and yes this weirdo > > >house business (eg. Herbert, recent Matmos, some Force Tracks 12s) ... >I > > >guess I find some good hip-hop tips on here as well. > > > > > >So, yeah, I'm just wondering whether anyone else is in a similar boat? >No > > >need to reply to the whole list, certainly no need to make a "these are >all > > >IDM"/"there aren't IDM at all, what are you doing here??" thread. :-) > > > > > >Mind you, with all this said, when I received my copies of that Surgery > > >Records comp 'Initial Release' I found I really enjoyed the vast >majority > > >of tracks. They're pretty damn downbeat though... I guess I'm a sucker >for > > >the far softer end of the spectrum... or if I want rowdy I listen to >rock. > > > > > >Thinking out loud... > > > > > >Michael > > > > > >np. mp3.com/loscil > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > > >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org