179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Josh Bown
To:
Philip Sherburne
Cc:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:24:47 -0700
Subject:
[idm] Re: definitions
Msg-Id:
<3AD34FEF.A9196B7D@undertone.com>
Mbox:
idm.0104.gz
I would say John Cage had a background as a musician but that when he was going all wacky he was really being a "sonic experimentalist" or something.... He was inspired by his own musicianship perhaps... or maybe I am just a crotchety stubborn conservative traditionalist who needs to wake up, smell the revolution and have a cup of purple kool-aid. Philip Sherburne wrote:
quoted 18 lines I also don't necessarily think a DJ is a "musician," but I think your> > I also don't necessarily think a DJ is a "musician," but I think your > definition: > > I am talking about those people who practiced scales, arpeggios, keys, > > modes, etc... and have an understanding of music theory > > etc... and then > > perform live in real time on an instrument utilizing that > > knowledge and > > practice to impress a croud. > > Is simply too narrow. That's fine for one particular strain - the > "classically-trained musician," perhaps, or the "formally schooled > musician," but there are all kinds and stripes out there. Some are idiot > savants. Some are unabahsed noisemakers. Some play mixing desks. John > Cage did all of what you said, but he also played toys and tapes and ideas. > Are the latter activities therefore not "musicianly," even if he was? > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org