I cant believe you've said that... You're actually saying that without
striving for some monetary reward from music, music can not be pushed enough
to be good. I guess with posts talking about Mozart's cool $400,000 cheques
and with the extremely intense pressure we are under thanks to western
(economy) society, that remark can actually be supported...
that's what makes this so sad.
however, i usually find that the people who are striving the most to make
the dollar of their 'art' usually have the most noticeable shit in the way
of production - and certainly lose 200% of any respect i might have had for
them as an artist. But i guess that doesn't matter much when you get to sit
next to puffy at the mtv awards.
for the love.. of... this took me an hour to write.
________________________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
n a t e . s c h m o l d
n e f e r i u . r e c o r d s
w w w . n e f e r i u . c o m
4 0 3 . 2 6 5 . 2 6 2 3
-----Original Message-----
From: Rjyan Kidwell [mailto:cex@tigerbeat6.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Jesse McCoppin
Cc: 'IDM list'
Subject: [idm] get your napstarr out of my coffers
Jesse, let me tell you a secret: people who make "music for the sake of
music" make BAD music.
Go over to mp3.com and click around for a bit, you'll see what I mean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org