179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris Fahey
To:
IDM (E-mail)
Date:
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:01:27 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] dsp clarification
Msg-Id:
<D79909C367EAD3118D3E00508B9B0EF5015F5B59@NYC3MSG01>
Mbox:
idm.0101.gz
quoted 4 lines i think the style that is being called DSP is just those> > i think the style that is being called DSP is just those > > who set up huge > > chains of effects and then change parameters of those > > effects
DSP is analogous to filters in Photoshop: They're not inherently evil, and in fact everyone uses them, even really good artists. The people who use the newest ones first seem often seem really cool... until everyone realizes that their work was done by pressing only one button. Certain DSP effects do more than just modify waveforms, in the same way that many Photoshop plug ins do more than modify a single quality of the image. There are Photoshop filters that, for example, add a little folded corner to your image, or add a lens flare. These tend to be obvious to anyone who knows Photoshop. When someone take a photo and adds a lens flare or a "trace outlines" filter to it and calls it art, advanced Photoshop users usually laugh at them. I'm sure the equivalent situation exists among DSP users. For example, I think there are DSP effects that make a single simple looping drum sample sound all crazy-chopped up and non-repeating just by clicking a button. DSP effects are cool, and the people who program them are fucking geniuses (usually). I suspect, however, that in 5 years much of what we refer to as "DSP IDM" will sound like what Kai's Power Tools looks like today. -Cf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org