"you just look like a hater"--->"everyone making it is
too pussy to name names."
************
don't be so ironic. there's no need to take this list
so personally or name-call others.
the reason i don't name names is because it gets you
involved in a tedious tangential argument over whether
an artist or track has any non-dsp merit or whether
the dsp is itself anything remarkable.
i merely was only trying to clarify what some people
mean when they say "just dsp", not identify which
artists have this problem. if you think all dsp
reliant idm is good, and you like the dsp, and you
don't think the structure is boring, then lucky for
you, you get to love way more music than me. the
point is, you get to decide for yourself who (if
anyone) is "just dsp".
in an earlier post, i did name names, by saying r.
devine. my opinion is that the barrage of clackitty
sounds and industrial-strength clouds of digital noise
he uses no longer hold my interest. i loved them at
first, heck i still like them, but don't need to hear
them again under new titles. furthermore, in my
opinion, his ability to use melody is not so good and
the beats are derivative. but for now, i consider
that just my opinion... what makes a "good melody"?
"original" beats? i'm not interested in getting
involved in that kind of discussion. i just wanted to
describe what it means when certain people use the
phrase "just dsp".
j
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org