179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:49:44 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] content vs. process
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.30.0101101034060.8316-100000@omni.state51.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<3A5C10BC.33298C3D@ix.netcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.0101.gz
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, christian adam hresko wrote: Very interesting message...
quoted 3 lines and maybe this is why IDM is quite emotionless. (at least i think it> and maybe this is why IDM is quite emotionless. (at least i think it > is. and that's actually one of the reasons i enjoy it...) you're > listening to a concept. a process. a method.
This is the case with all music IMHO. It's just that some processes are more ingrained in popular technique than others. There's nothing more processed based than your average pop song... They're just all using the same process. I think the problem with process based computer music, is where musicians use other people's process and take credit. The idea that you can use Autechre's patch and then create fantastic music is false. Software that creates music is not a tool, it's a music score! So all you're doing is playing Autechre's music, or performing Autechre's music, or remixing Autechre's music. But you're starting with a score, not merely a tool. This comes down to one problem: people have trouble seeing programming computers as a creative, expressive act. A computer can do nothing without humans, and writing code is an act of human expression. And so if you're using software written by someone else, and that software is having an influence over how you are creating, then you are in grave danger of creating derivative works. Unless you use your imagination, and use the software in ways in which the original programmer didn't predict, then you are not being creative, in my opinion. Of course, this leaves a great deal of scope for creativity with good software. But too often you can hear the cubase, or the rebirth in a piece of music. I don't have any particular problem with this until I think about how little credit the original programmers are getting. But perhaps this is an opinion borne out of my heavy use of free sofwtware. When I'm writing electronic music I am very conscious about how the software is defining my creative 'search space', and highly respectful of the people who contribute towards making my individual expression possible. This includes the operating system, microcode, device driver hackers, because all these things are essential to me and are important creative acts in themselves. I feel that only programmers can create truly original pieces of electronic music. MAX is a visual programming language, but if you use it by piecing together other people's patches, then you should give those people credit. Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org