179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
franz enmark
To:
Matthew Burrows , ,
Date:
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 20:12:02 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] radiocativity reply and Autechre briefly
Msg-Id:
<4.1.20001212193754.00a24550@mail.8noll2.se>
In-Reply-To:
<F192IkyPzGNsokLQ8aZ0000b512@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0012.gz
quoted 6 lines that is nothing like what i was saying....the fact that it is 'product' does>that is nothing like what i was saying....the fact that it is 'product' does >not leave it meaningless, but it does demean it: the quality of the music is >not the key criteria for any of these groups/people, the shifting of 'units' >is, (i'm sure mr paradinas does not think of his music as a product or unit, >but his bosses at virgin sure as fuck do) to argue otherwise is to ignore >the simple economic reality of such companies
"they said we'd be artistically free when we signed that bit of paper they meant let's make a lotsa money and worry about it later" (complete control) the clash were never compromising, and the fact that they were signed to a big label (columbia) doesn't change that. they reached heads all over and i think that is far more important than to be pc on the underground scene. of course the bosses at columbia or virgin like it when the money keeps rolling in but they're the fools here, not joe strummer or mike paradinas. /f --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org