179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
component
To:
Lee Azzarello , IDM
Date:
Wed, 6 Dec 2000 22:00:01 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Intelligent Trance
Msg-Id:
<00ec01c05ff9$cde4e740$8345343f@oemcomputer>
Mbox:
idm.0012.gz
Well trance was seen as something alot different. This was before the mass genre-ficatication took place. Rob www.componentrecords.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Lee Azzarello <roswell@alumni.antioch-college.edu> To: IDM <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 8:30 PM Subject: Re: [idm] Intelligent Trance
quoted 70 lines Funny fact:> Funny fact: > > The compilation series titled "Trance Atlantic Express" and "Trance Europe > Express", from like '93 or so has a Mu-ziq and Aphex Twin track. As well as > Air Liquide, 808 State, Moby, Plastikman, and a whole slew of people that no > one in their right mind would associate with trance...times were different > back then. > > http://www.demon.co.uk/volume/natlantic.html > > -l > > > on 12/6/00 5:00 PM, Ross Balmer at ross@tui.co.uk wrote: > > > I remember back in 1994 "trance" wasn't commercial at all and it seemed like > > a pretty good direction to take the music. Now there's loads of it and much > > of it is formulaic dross. That doesn't preclude the idea of there still > > being good trance. A lot of of the classic stuff is still good. > > > > I have an abiding hatred of a lot of the awful rubbish which has been > > perpetrated since trance music crossed over into the mainstream, but if > > anybody knows of anything good which has come out of that style in recent > > years then I for one want to know about it. > > > > Ross. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rotkin te" <red_shift_x7@hotmail.com> > > To: <scifijosh23@yahoo.com>; <idm@hyperreal.org> > > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 12:30 AM > > Subject: Re: [idm] Intelligent Trance > > > > > >> intelligent trance. isnt that an oxymoron? > >> > >> > >>> From: joshtwentythree <scifijosh23@yahoo.com> > >>> To: idm@hyperreal.org > >>> Subject: Re: [idm] Intelligent Trance > >>> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:34:41 -0800 (PST) > >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 > >>> > >>> I don't particularly agree at all with the use of > >>> Intelligent in the front of any music style, what > >>> makes music intelligent? I think it's just kinda > >>> pretentious...don't mean I don't like da music...I > >>> just don't agree with the name...and I think trance > >>> only comes in unintelligent flavors...good trance is > >>> techno... ;) > >>> > >>> josh23 > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > > > > -l[e^2] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org