179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
wells@hiro.submute.net
To:
kent@avalon.net , atomly@atomly.com , idm@hyperreal.org
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 14:16:04 -0500
Subject:
Re: Re: [idm] house vs. idm
Msg-Id:
<20001116141651.SM00190@qonos.softcomca.com>
Mbox:
idm.0011.gz
One of the things I always appreciated and loved about the IDM genre is that a good portion of the 'producers' out there are basically geeks with computers and a few boxen. I liked the idea that people were out there with no musical background, perhaps not even the ability to play any instrument, yet still they were pumping out this wonderfully different kind of music. Original Message: ----------------- From: Kent williams kent@avalon.net Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:30:30 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: [idm] house vs. idm Though it might be more accurate to say, "most IDM producers aren't aware of it WHEN they make a key change." People modulate all the time, without really knowing what that means. And it becomes a pretty blurry concept in the folk/pop tradition of the last 50 years, which is based around changing guitar chords in sometimes arbitrary ways. .. Perhaps people need to try and drag some other tools out of the shed. Hell Squarepusher's reputation for innovation rests entirely on two fairly simple things -- he throws triplets into his breaks, and he can play an actual instrument. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This message has been posted from Mail2Web http://www.mail2web.com/ Web Hosting for $9.95 per month! Visit: http://www.yourhosting.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org