179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Wightman, Scott W
To:
'Eric Frans' , 'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 01:19:11 +0100
Subject:
[idm] Missing the Point whilst talking debating thinking and cunting ab out it (reading this msg is a waste of time....)
Msg-Id:
<B9B835374D95D4119C86009027D6396B529BEE@sernt28.essex.ac.uk>
Mbox:
idm.0010.gz
hELLO Glovers re: Dance/Electronic split To make such a thing is to ignore the origins which you talk of so fondlely fondly... sure Ae no Throbbing Gs/Behrmann/etc but Warp and affiliates, not to mention many others are all rave inspired rave-led..... one has only to listen to i.e. Trainer - archetype idm, sure, but fucking rave too ("Uneasy Listening" is R A V E) rave rave rave rave .... so yeah. And Ninja Tune isn't idm if your gonna make that split, nor shadder, yet you talk about them and own their records (YES YOU DO). It never occured to me that the more abstract (or not) side a hiphop would be considered idm (not that i give a fuck) but it seems odd to make a distinction like that and still discourse (cough) on hiphop (or hip-hop, or hip hop or beatz or even beats) - if anyone wants to say that Warp/Rephlex/Spymania/Skam isn't dance thats probably cos you cant/wont "dance" to it. - oh fucking blah - what IS an electronic record? or a dance one? genres are interesting (someone sed this earlier) but geeks are fucking geeky. a thrilling conclusion..... i am drunk socks x --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org