Here's a reply to the message "[idm] kid a vs. homogenic" written on
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:10:31 -0400 (EDT):
quoted 2 lines if bjork's homogenic wasn't idm in 1997, then how the hell can radiohead's
>if bjork's homogenic wasn't idm in 1997, then how the hell can radiohead's
>kid a be idm in 2000?
Well, I've always thought of Bjork as being closer to the IDM
fraternity than any other. The Sugarcubes were always a whacky,
way-out sorta indie group and once Bjork hooked up with 808 State
there was no looking back as far as her connections with electronic
music was concerned.
quoted 2 lines i mean, c'mon... idioteque is the only song that really has that
>i mean, c'mon... idioteque is the only song that really has that
>idm-esque music.
You need to listen to some more stuff on the Fat Cat label. Too
electronic to be called "indie", too indie to be called electronic.
quoted 1 line i wonder if they've even heard of "idm"...
>i wonder if they've even heard of "idm"...
Who knows. The term does seem to be used more in the US than it does
in Europe.
--
Mark Stevens
http://www.headspin.clara.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org